Skip to Main Content

Converting qPCR results to resemble Culture Method results

Familiarity with the results is important

Since many operators like to have results reported in a format that is familiar to them, it is possible to convert the gene copies/mL obtained from a qPCR reaction into an approximate cells/mL which is a calculation based on the average amount of gene copies per organism determined from literature investigations.

For LuminUltra qPCR assays like Legionella spp. or Total E. Coli which have specific genetically-defined targets, it is easy to convert from gene copies/mL to cells/mL because all the species covered are from the same genus, and are genetically similar. We can say with high confidence that the average Legionella bacteria contains 1 gene copy per organism, primarily because the bacteria are well researched and reported upon in scientific literature.

For LuminUltra qPCR assays like Sulfate-Reducing Prokaryotes (SRP), the calculation of cells/mL includes more uncertainty due to the huge diversity of organisms capable of reducing sulfate, of which some species may be separated by a few hundred million years of divergent evolution. Sulfate-reduction is a metabolic function, not a genetic definition, and so qPCR assays designed to detect and quantify these organisms must often target different genes which are present in the different phylogenetic lineages of sulfate reducers. Further, many of these organisms are not readily culturable, and may not contain the same number of gene copies per organism when compared to other classes or even domains of sulfate reducers. Calculation of cell/mL for SRP relies on researching the scientific literature to determine an average number of copies of gene per organism, which allows the conversion of gene copies/mL into estimated cells/mL.

Since CFU/mL is the most common and well-known method of reporting microbiological testing data, many water system operators like to be able to compare new techniques to this existing method. In general, the purpose of CFU/mL or cells/mL is to represent the concentration of potentially pathogenic (in the case of public health) or industrially harmful organisms. Culture-based methods attempt this measurement by counting colony-forming units, which were presumably created by a single “unit” (cell) which then grew to produce a visible colony. Likewise, by qPCR, the amount of gene copies is measured, and converted into cells/mL by knowledge about how many gene copies are present per organism.

Culture and qPCR are both microbiological methods trying to measure the concentration of organisms, however, their method to obtain these results is vastly different. Culture is prone to missing VNBCs (viable but non-culturable cells), has limitations based on medium, temperature and culture time which affect the population grown on the plate, and generally takes from 1 to 14 days depending on the desired organism. Further, the results are semi-quantitative due to the subjective nature of counting colonies. qPCR in contrast, will capture DNA from all living organisms regardless of their physiological state, can handle samples from all types of matrices, and provides objective, quantitative results within 2 hours.

For these reasons, it is difficult to directly compare CFU/mL to cells/mL obtained by qPCR. While both techniques set out to measure the same property (microorganism concentration), their inherent technological differences preclude their direct comparison. For operators who rely on specific CFU/mL thresholds for their systems, comparative work can be performed to determine the correlation in any given system. LuminUltra’s applications team is always available for questions and to assist with the interpretation of qPCR data.

qPCR testing can be accomplished in less than two hours in the field or the laboratory using our GeneCount® Q-8, Q-16 or Q-48 instruments, with DNA purification and assays kits available for all sample types.

Michael Thomas

With a B.Sc. in Medicinal Chemistry and experience in the application and sales of field and laboratory instrumentation, Mike is our ‘science-meets-technology’ person, also known as our Application Scientist. Mike’s role will be to ensure customers fully leverage our software enablement platform, so they can get the most out of their water quality data. His passions are music, reading, grilling, and science, though not necessarily in that order. During Canada’s short summers he spends time trying out the local craft breweries, taking road trips to concerts and exploring the parks and hiking trails of the Maritimes.

Related Posts

All you need to know about qPCR

qPCR with quick and easy-to-interpret results will be key As quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) becomes more accepted and available to a range of industries looking to quantify their (specific) microbial populations, the ability to provide quick and easy-to-interpret results will be key. The initial development of qPCR assays has been focused on potential human… Read More

Legionella: The “quiet pandemic”

Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is likely that many people have forgotten about Legionella, which has been described as a “quiet pandemic” by legislators in the United States. While the focus of many government health authorities has been to react to and reduce the impact of COVID-19, the many stay at home… Read More

A Primer On Legionella

A Synopsis on Legionella Legionella, the bacteria responsible for causing Legionnaire’s disease, is one of the most significant sources of waterborne disease outbreaks in the U.S. Investigations by the CDC have indicated that many cases could have been prevented through better water management. We’ve previously written about Legionnaire’s disease and how ATP testing can be… Read More

Your browser is out of date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now